Page 53 - Proxy Statement - 2020
P. 53

PSU Awards (55% of LTI Award)  /  Compensation Discussion and Analysis


          Performance for each metric is measured independently, so PSUs  our TSR against the S&P 500 index is appropriate because (1) it
          can be earned as long as the threshold is satisfied for at least  measures the interest of investors for whom we compete,
          one metric. The “Target” level is generally viewed as achievable  (2) there is no consensus of a significantly better peer group
          although it has not been achieved every year. The “Maximum”  with readily available comparable financial information; and
          level is a stretch that is attainable if we outperform in the area  (3) by using rTSR as a modifier rather than a primary
          measured. PSU payments are capped at the target level if three-  measurement, we give our other performance measures more
          year TSR is negative.                                  weight and their focus on profitability and growth both provide
                                                                 long-term value creation.


          The performance will be measured in February 2022 for the  We believe that EBITDA, Sales Growth and rTSR metrics drive the
          three-year period beginning January 2019 through December  behaviors of our management team in ways that are intended to
          2021 to determine (1) the three-year cumulative EBITDA for  create the most value for our shareholders.
          Martin Marietta against the target identified in the PSU Award
          Agreement, and (2) the three-year cumulative Sales Growth  Performance-Based RSU Awards
          against the target identified in the PSU Award Agreement. The
          payment amount will be further modified by the rTSR for the  (45% of LTI Award)
          three-year period as against the S&P 500, as set forth in the PSU
                                                                 RSUs vest in three equal portions, each on the anniversary of the
          Award Agreement. The Committee in its discretion may adjust
                                                                 grant date (February 20, 2019) over a period of three years,
          the final award values only as set forth in the Agreement, either
                                                                 subject to satisfaction of the performance measure and generally
          collectively or on an individual basis, in recognition of factors  to continued employment through each one of those
          that are unusual or nonrecurring.                      anniversaries. Once the restricted period ends (each anniversary
                                                                 for one third of the total RSU award), the recipient will be issued
          Over the three-year performance period, up to one-third of the  unrestricted shares of common stock (minus applicable taxes).
          target PSUs may be earned each year based on one-third of the  The 2019 RSUs awarded to executive officers are also subject to
          three-year cumulative EBITDA and Sales Growth goals. Each  a performance measure that a stated level of EBITDA be
          year, any earned PSUs are not distributed until the end of the  achieved during the first year. If the performance measure is
          three-year measurement period when the cumulative three-year  satisfied, then the RSUs will continue to vest. If the performance
          performance is determined. The actual PSUs will equal the  measure is not satisfied, then the RSUs will be forfeited. For the
          greater of the total PSUs earned for each of the annual periods  2019 grants, the performance measure was satisfied.
          (capped at 100% of the annual target, that is, one-third of the
          cumulative target) or the amount earned for cumulative three-
          year performance (capped at 200% of target). The final amount  2019-2021 Performance Goals
          of earned PSUs to be distributed are then subject to the three-
                                                                 In setting minimum and maximum levels of payment, we
          year rTSR modifier.
                                                                 reviewed historical levels of performance against our long-range
                                                                 plan commitments and conducted sensitivity analyses on
          The PSUs will convert to unrestricted common stock and be  alternative outcomes focused on identifying likely minimum and
          distributed conditioned upon and to the extent that the  maximum boundary performance levels. Levels between 100%
          performance goals have been met, which will be determined in  and the minimum and maximum levels were derived using linear
          February 2022. These awards are also generally subject to  interpolation between the performance hurdles.
          continued employment through the date the PSUs vest. The
          actual financial performance targets and achievement against  The specific EBITDA and Sales Growth target values for the
          those targets will be disclosed at the end of the three-year  2019-2021 PSUs are not publicly disclosed at the time of grant
          performance period.                                    due to the proprietary nature and competitive sensitivity of the
                                                                 information. However, the method used to calculate the awards
                                                                 will be based on actual performance compared to our 2019-
          Selection of Relative TSR                              2021 targets, with straight-line interpolation between points.
                                                                 The individual award agreements require the adjustment of
          We selected rTSR for the PSUs to measure our performance
                                                                 goals to ensure that the ultimate payouts are not impacted to
          against the companies in the S&P 500 index. We recognize that
                                                                 the benefit or detriment of management by specified events,
          every industry faces different challenges and opportunities, and
                                                                 such as unplanned pension contributions, changes in accounting
          that the S&P 500 index does not perfectly correlate to the
                                                                 (GAAP) standards or impact of an acquisition or divestiture. The
          environment in which Martin Marietta operates. However, we
                                                                 Committee may exercise its discretion to reduce the final vesting
          believe that the majority of our closest competitors are not
                                                                 percentage to no more than target if the Company’s three-year
          publicly-held companies or are not U.S. companies, and
                                                                 TSR is less than zero.
          therefore accurate information to potentially use as comparisons
          is not readily available. As a result, we believe that comparing
                                                                                                   2020 PROXY STATEMENT  49
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58