Page 65 - Martin Marietta - 2021 Proxy Statement
P. 65

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS / COMPENSATION DECISION PROCESS



          The Committee studies competitive total compensation data from various sources, including proxy statements of the peer
          group. Since proxy statements do not provide precise comparisons by position to our executive officers, in 2020 the
          Committee also took into consideration published independent compensation surveys of companies with revenue in the
          range of $2.5 billion to $8.0 billion as to median levels for each executive officer as well as private compensation survey
          data. Where available, size-adjusted market values were developed using regression analysis. This statistical technique
          accounts for revenue size differences within the peer group and develops an estimated market value for a similar-size
          company as Martin Marietta. The size-adjusted 50th percentile for total compensation is a key reference point for the
          Committee. On average, the target for our NEO total compensation opportunities is competitively positioned within a
          reasonable range of the size-adjusted 50th percentile.

          Although the Committee uses the size-adjusted 50th percentile as its starting point in setting compensation levels, the
          compensation packages for executive officers may vary materially from it based on several factors. Market data, position,
          tenure, individual and organization performance, retention needs and internal pay equity have been the primary factors
          considered in decisions to increase or decrease compensation opportunities. Specifically, the Committee typically sets
          compensation levels below the size-adjusted 50th percentile for executive officers with relatively less relevant experience,
          less responsibility, less tenure with Martin Marietta and/or lower performance ratings. Conversely, if an officer consistently
          receives favorable performance ratings, accumulates years of service and expertise in relevant areas, has more responsibility
          and/or has significant other achievements, his or her compensation will typically be above the size-adjusted 50th
          percentile.

          Other Compensation Program Features


          Compensation Program Risk Assessment
          We perform a thorough annual review of our compensation program structure and all compensation programs, which are
          also reviewed in detail with the Committee. We believe our executive pay is appropriate and provides necessary incentives
          to our executives to achieve our financial and strategic goals without encouraging them to take excessive risks in their
          business decisions. Our compensation structure does not include features that are reasonably likely to have a material
          adverse effect on the Company. Compensation program features that mitigate against risks include the following:

          • Our annual incentive compensation plan does not provide payment for poor individual or corporate performance,
            regardless of whether the failure to achieve target was outside management’s control.

          • There are caps on the long-term equity awards, even if the required performance-related criteria are exceeded.
          • A majority of the NEOs’ compensation is long-term, with equity grants vesting over three to five years, depending on the
            award.

          • Our compensation is not based on highly leveraged short-term incentives that encourage high risk investments at the
            expense of long-term value.

          • Long-term compensation to executive officers is based on specific performance measures that balance long-term growth
            and returns.

          • The Committee uses benchmarking data and the advice of its independent compensation consultant to keep
            compensation in line with typical market practices and appropriate to Martin Marietta’s needs.
          • We use a balanced portfolio of long-term incentive programs.

          • The Committee’s governance process requires review and approval of all compensation over a certain amount.

          Stock-Based Awards Generally

          All of Martin Marietta’s active equity-based award plans have been approved by shareholders. Our Stock Plan requires a
          minimum vesting period of 12 months for restricted stock or RSUs and a minimum vesting period of 36 months for stock
          options or stock appreciation rights (SARs). The Company has not issued SARs and has not issued stock options since
          2015.


          60 2021 PROXY STATEMENT
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70